Commentary for Horayot 15:3

נפש אם הכהן המשיח הרי משיח כיחיד מה יחיד אם אכל בהוריית בית דין פטור אף זה אם אכל בהוריית ב"ד פטור מה יחיד אם אכל בלא הורייה חייב אף זה אם אכל בלא הורייה חייב ת"ל לאשמת העם הרי אשמתו כאשמת העם מה העם אינן חייבין אלא אם כן הורו אף זה אינו חייב אלא אם כן הורה. אית תניי תני העם ב"ד מה העם הורו הן ועשו אחרים חייבין אף זה הורה הוא ועשו אחרים יהא חייב ת"ל אשר חטא על מה שחטא הוא מביא ואינו מביא על מה שחטאו אחרים. אית תניי תני העם ציבור מה העם הורו אחרים ועשו הן חייבין אף זה הורו אחרים ועשה הוא יהא חייב תלמיד לומר אשר חטא על מה שחטא הוא מביא אינו מביא על מה שחטאו אחרים רבי יעקב בשם רבי לעזר והוא שיהא יודע לישא וליתן בהלכה דלא כן מה נן

Originally, whosoever wanted to remove [the ashes from] the Altar, removed [it]. At a time that they were many they would run and ascend the ramp [of the altar] and he that came first into the four cubits won [the privilege]. And if two were even, the appointed one would say to them [all]: Raise the finger(s). And what did they put forward [i.e. raise]? One or two. And [but] they do not put forth [raise] the thumb in the Temple: It happened [once] that two were even, and [they] were running and ascending the ramp. And one [of them] pushed his fellow and his foot was broken. And when the court saw that they were coming into danger, they enacted that they shall not remove [the ashes from] the altar except by lot. There were four lots there, and this [one] was the first lot. R. Manna questioned: And why did they not institute a lot for the removal of the ashes? Come and see: Slaughtering is valid with a stranger, and you say it has a lot; the removal of the ashes is prohibited [to be done] by a stranger, and you say, it has no lot? R. Manna the said again: Slaughtering is only valid by day, but the removal of the ashes is valid all night, if you say will cast a lot, even he will not arise on the doubtful [chance]. What did you see to say so? (Leviticus 6:2-3) "All the night and he shall remove [lift up]." From here [we learn] that the removal of the ashes is valid all night. A stranger [i.e. a non-priest] who removed [the ashes, what is the law]? R. Yochanan said: He is guilty [of death]. Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: He is exempt. What is the reasoning of Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish? (Numbers 18:7) "A service of gift", excluding this one which is [a service of] removal. What is the reasoning of Rabbi Yochanan? (Numbers 18:7) "In everything pertaining to the altar." Rabbi Yossi bei Rabbi Bun in the name of Rav: Four

Explore commentary for Horayot 15:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.