Talmud Jerusalem
Talmud Jerusalem

Talmud for Nedarim 11:2

יש נדר בתוך נדר ואין שבועה בתוך שבועה כיצד אמר הריני נזיר אם אוכל הריני נזיר אם אוכל ואכל חייב על כל אחת ואחת שבועה שלא אוכל שבועה שלא אוכל שבועה שלא אוכל ואכל אינו חייב אלא אחת:

יש נדר בתוך נדר ואין שבועה בתוך שבועה כיצד אמר הריני נזיר אם אוכל הריני נזיר אם אוכל ואכל חייב על כל אחת ואחת שבועה שלא אוכל שבועה שלא אוכל שבועה שלא אוכל ואכל אינו חייב אלא אחת:

Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot

HALAKHAH: “What a woman finds or makes with her hands belongs to her husband,” etc. Rebbi Ḥizqiah in the name of Rebbi Immi: Rebbi Joḥanan and Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish disagree: One said, this is everybody’s opinion, the other said it is in dispute5Between R. Meïr and R. Joḥanan the Alexandrian who disagree in Mishnah 5:5 whether a man can dedicate his wife’s work to Heaven.. We do not know who said what. It is reasonable that Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish should be the one who said it is in dispute since he explained that [the husband] provides her with food but does not give her a silver obolus as pocket money6Cf. Halakhah 5:5; Nedarim 11:4, Notes 51–55. R. Meïr holds that the obligatory work the wife does for her husband is for her silver obolus and what she does in addition is for her food. Therefore, if he does not provide her with pocket money, he has no right to her work and, similarly, to what she finds. For R. Joḥanan the Alexandrian, the work is for her food and the excess for the pocket money. (This is where R. Joḥanan disagrees.) Therefore, the husband has the right to what she makes and finds., and we did state: “If he does not give her a silver obolus as pocket money, what she makes with her hands is hers.” The work of her hands is parallel to what she finds. Rebbi Jacob bar Immi came in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: It is everybody’s opinion7What she finds belongs to her husband according to everybody, as explained in the next paragraph.. That means that Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish varies in his opinions8It seems that he taught different approaches to different students..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot

MISHNAH: The levir does not cause her to eat heave81Since he cannot acquire his sister-in-law otherwise than by sexual relations, after which she will be his wife in all respects, a woman engaged to be married by the levir is not part of his clan.. If she spent six months for her husband and six months for the levir, or even all the time for the husband except for one day for the levir82The moment a levir enters the picture, the earlier acquisition by the husband is suspended., or all the time for the levir except for one day for the husband, she cannot eat heave. That is the earlier Mishnah83Both Mishnaiot 3 and 4.. The court in later times said that no woman eats heave unless she had been entering the bridal chamber84The definitive marriage. For the original husband, no sexual act is required..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Nedarim

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Nedarim

Available for Premium members only
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse