Talmud Jerusalem
Talmud Jerusalem

Talmud for Shekalim 24:2

בשלש קופות של שלש שלש סאין תורמין את הלשכה וכתוב עליהן אל"ף בי"ת גימ"ל רבי ישמעאל אומר יונית כתוב עליהן אלפ"א בית"א גמ"א אין התורם נכנס לא בפרגוד חפות ולא במנעל ולא בסנדל ולא בתפילין ולא בקמיע שמא יעני ויאמרו מעון הלשכה העני או שמא יעשיר ויאמר מתרומת הלשכה העשיר שאדם צריך לצאת ידי הבריות כדרך שהוא צריך לצאת ידי המקום שנאמר (במדבר לב) והייתם נקיים מה' ומישראל ואומר (משלי ג) ומצא חן ושכל טוב בעיני אלהים ואדם:

בשלש קופות של שלש שלש סאין תורמין את הלשכה וכתוב עליהן אל"ף בי"ת גימ"ל רבי ישמעאל אומר יונית כתוב עליהן אלפ"א בית"א גמ"א אין התורם נכנס לא בפרגוד חפות ולא במנעל ולא בסנדל ולא בתפילין ולא בקמיע שמא יעני ויאמרו מעון הלשכה העני או שמא יעשיר ויאמר מתרומת הלשכה העשיר שאדם צריך לצאת ידי הבריות כדרך שהוא צריך לצאת ידי המקום שנאמר (במדבר לב) והייתם נקיים מה' ומישראל ואומר (משלי ג) ומצא חן ושכל טוב בעיני אלהים ואדם:

Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot

MISHNAH: Fifteen [categories of] women1Deut. 25:5 requires that the widow of any man who died without legitimate or illegitimate issue be married by the man’s brother. If, however, that brother is forbidden one of the deceased’s wives by the incest prohibition of Lev. 18 or the rules of Deut. 25:5–10, she may not be married by the brother to whom she is forbidden. free their co-wives2The House of Hillel hold that if one widow is forbidden, all co-widows are forbidden. This is not accepted by the House of Shammai, Mishnah 6. and the co-wives of their co-wives from ḥalîṣah and levirate forever3If one of three brothers had married the second brother’s daughter and another woman, died childless, the other wife was married by the third brother who already had another wife, if the third also dies childless both of his widows are forbidden because one of them is forbidden. This scenario can be extended to n polygamous brothers; n arbitrary.. They are the following: one’s daughter4This statement seems to be needed only for an illegitimate daughter, except the daughter from a gentile or a slave woman who are not legally his relatives (Rashi ad loc.). Legitimate children are covered by Lev. 18:17. However, the Yerushalmi (Note 135) does not make any distinction between legitimate and illegitimate daughters.
Sadducees (followed by Karaites and Christians) did forbid marriage with a niece since marriage with an aunt is a biblical prohibition and they held that the incest prohibitions of Lev. 18 are gender symmetric. Pharisaic opinion is that “one does not introduce punishable offence by argument;” what is written is forbidden, what is not written is not (biblically) forbidden.
, his daughter’s daughter and his son’s daughter5Lev. 18:10., his wife’s daughter and her daughter‘s daughter and her son’s daughter6Lev. 18:17: “The genitals of a women and her daughter (including mother-in-law and wife) you may not [both] uncover, her son’s daughter (wife’s granddaughter or wife as paternal grandmother’s daughter) or her daughter’s daughter (this forbids the wife’s maternal grandmother) you may not marry to uncover her genitals; they are relatives, it is tabu.”, his mother-in-law and his mother-in-law’s mother and his father-in-law’s mother, his sister7This is needed only for the maternal halfsister (Lev. 18:9) married to a paternal halfbrother. It will be established that the levirate applies only to paternal brothers; the first marriage of the halfsister was legitimate. and his maternat aunt8Lev. 18:13. and his wife’s sister9Lev. 18:18., his maternal halfbrother’s wife10Lev. 18:16. It is assumed that the halfbrother died or divorced his wife who then married a paternal halfbrother of the man in question to whom she was not related. The earlier marriage to the maternal halfbrother forbade her permanently to the levir, the brother-in-law on the husband’s side.
Since in Deut. 25, “brother” is assumed to mean “paternal brother”, it needs some discussion in the Halakhah why in Lev. 18 “brother” may mean “maternal or paternal brother” since the usual stance is that in legal texts one word can have only one meaning.
, the wife of his brother who did not live in his world11Deut. 25:5 introduces the rules of the levirate with the statement “If brothers live together”. This means that a brother born after the death of another cannot marry the widow of the deceased, i. e., the childless widow does not have to wait until the newborn baby grows up to marry her but, if there is no other brother, she may immediately marry outside the family., and his daughter-in-law12This is obvious (Lev. 18:15) except for the case that the son had died and his widow married a brother of her father-in-law unrelated to her. The prohibition of 18:15 is permanent; the earlier marriage to the son forbade her permanently to the father-in-law..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Bava Kamma

MISHNAH: There are four main categories of damages1Most rules of payment for damages may be derived from the examples of damages treated in Ex. 21–22, as explained in the Halakhah.: The bull2An agressive bull goring with his horns; Ex. 21:28–32;35–36., and the pit3A person digging a pit in the public domain is responsible for any damage caused by his action; Ex. 21:33–34., and the devourer4Damage caused by an animal other than goring: feeding (“the tooth”) and trampling (“the foot”), Ex. 22:4. The Aramaic root בעי is found in Pseudo-Jonathan to Num. 22:2 as translation of Hebrew לחך “to devour”. The unusual expression מַבְעֶה is used to subsume two legal terms under one., and the setting on fire5Ex. 22:5.. The bull is not like the devourer, nor the devourer like the bull6Since goring, trampling, and devouring are all ascribed to the same animal, the question arises why the bull has to be mentioned in two different categories both in the Mishnah and in the biblical text. The details are given only in the Babli: An animal which gores is intent on causing damage; therefore the rules are different for known agressive or generally not agressive animals since these require different levels of supervision. But the rules for damage caused by feeding and trampling are the same for all animals.; neither of them who are alive is like the pit7It is obvious and confirmed by all other sources that the positions of “pit” and “fire” have to be switched. which is not alive, nor either of them which move in causing damage is like the fire7It is obvious and confirmed by all other sources that the positions of “pit” and “fire” have to be switched. which does not move in causing damage. The common theme of them is that they are usually causing damage and you are obligated to watch them, and if damage was caused the person causing the damage is obligated to pay the damages in best quality land8If the person causing the damage cannot pay, the person collecting damages can foreclose the culprit’s land with the highest value per unit of surface area. As biblical law, this applies to damages caused by unattended animals, Ex. 22:4..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Taanit

It is written58Joel 2:13., and tear your hearts instead of your garments and return to the Eternal, your God, for He is compassionate and merciful. Rebbi Joshua ben Levi said, if you tear up your hearts in repentance you will not have to tear your garments about your sons or daughters59They will not die young., only about the Eternal, your God. Why? For He is compassionate and merciful, slow in anger, full of love, and sorrow about evil. 60Babli Eruvin22a. Rebbi Samuel bar Naḥman in the name of Rebbi Jonathan: It is not written here “slow in one anger” but “slow in anger”. He is slow in anger with the just ones, and slow in anger with the evil ones. Rebbi Aḥa, Rebbi Tanḥum ben Rebbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: It is not written here “slow in one anger” but “slow in anger”. He is slow in anger before he starts to collect. Once He starts to collect he is slow to complete His collection. 61Šeqalim5:2 Note 39, Yom Tov3:9 Note 124; Babli Bava qamma50a/b. Rebbi Ḥanina said, anybody who says that the All-Merciful is indulgent, his intestines shall dissolve themselves; for He is forbearing and then collects His due. Rebbi Levi said, what means “forbearing”? He is far from being angry61Šeqalim5:2 Note 39, Yom Tov3:9 Note 124; Babli Bava qamma50a/b.. {A parable of} a king who had two violent legions. Said the king, if they dwell with me at the capital, if the people of the capital would anger me they would get up and decimate them. Therefore I shall send them to a faraway place. Then if the people of the capital would anger me, until I shall send for them the people of the capital will pacify me and I will accept their excuses. [So the Holy One, praise to Him, said, anger and rage are angels of destruction. Therefore I shall send them to a faraway place. Therefore if Israel would anger me, until I shall send for them and bring them, Israel will repent and I shall accept their repentance.]62Corrector’s addition; no source known for it. That is what is written63Is. 13:5., they come from a far country, from the ends of heaven64The verse continues: The Eternal and the instruments of His rage, to destroy the earth., etc. Rebbi Isaac said, not only that but He locked them up. That is what is written65Jer. 50:25., the Eternal opened His storehouse and removed the vessels of his wrath. By the time He opened and He took pains, His mercies take over. It was stated in the name of Rebbi Meïr: For the Eternal left His place66Is. 26:21., He went from mode to mode. He left the mode of judgement and came to the mode of mercy67The designation of the mode of judgment is the name Elohim“supreme power”, referring to His rule of the forces of nature. The designation of the mode of mercy is YHWH“Eternal”. for Israel.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

Available for Premium members only

Jerusalem Talmud Peah

Available for Premium members only

Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

Available for Premium members only

Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

Available for Premium members only

Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

Available for Premium members only
Previous VerseFull Chapter