Talmud Jerusalem
Talmud Jerusalem

Talmud for Yoma 3:1

מצרים אינה מעכבת הרי מצאנו דבר מעכב למד מדבר שאינו מעכב ודבר שאינו מעכב למד מדבר מעכב הא רבי שמעון בן לקיש מקשי לה מן הן מייתי לה רשב"ל כהדא דתני רבי ישמעאל (ויקרא ט״ז:ג׳) בזאת יבא אהרן אל הקדש כאמור בעניין מה אמור בעניין מפרישין אותו כל שבעה ועובד כל שבעה ומחנכין אותו כל שבעה אף זה מפרישין אותו כל שבעה ועובד כל שבעה ומחנכין אותו כל שבעה וכי אמור הוא בעניין אלא מכיון שמיתת בני אהרן אמורה בעניין ולא מתו אלא במילואין כמו שהוא אמור בעניין ולית סופיה דרשב"ל מישמעינה מן הדין קריא אלא כאינש דשמע מילה ומקשי עלה א"ר יוסה בי רבי בון טעמא דרשב"ל (שמות כ״ד:ט״ז) וישכן כבוד ה' על הר סיני מה משה לא נכנס לפני ולפנים עד שנתקדש בענן כל שבעה אף אהרן לא נכנס לפני ולפנים עד שנתרבה בשמן המשחה כלש בעה על דעתיה דרבי יוחנן למה מיתת בני אהרן אמורה בעניין ולא מתו אלא במילואים א"ר חייה בר בא בני אהרן באחד בניסן מתו ולמה הוא מזכיר מיתתן ביום הכיפורים ללמדך שכשם שיום הכיפורים מכפר על ישראל כך מיתתן של צדיקים מכפרת על ישראל א"ר בא בר בינה למה סמך הכתוב מיתת מרים לפרשת פרה ללמדך שכשם שאפר פרה מכפרת על ישראל כך מיתתן של צדיקים מכפרת על ישראל א"ר יודן בי ר' שלום למה סמך הכתוב מיתת אהרן לשיבור הלוחות ללמדך שמיתתן של צדיקים קשה לפני הקב"ה כשיבור לוחות כתיב (דברים י׳:ו׳) ובני ישראל נסעו מבארת בני יעקן מוסרה שם מת אהרן וכי במוסרה מת אהרן והלא בהר ההר מת הדא הוא דכתיב (במדבר ל״ג:ל״ח) ויעל אהרן הכהן אל הר ההר על פי ה' וימת שם אלא מכיון שמת אהרן נסתלקו ענני הכבוד ובקשו הכנענים להתגרות בם הדא הוא דכתיב (במדבר כ״א:א׳) וישמע הכנעני מלך ערד יושב הנגד כי בא ישראל דרך האתרים וילחם בישראל מהו דרך האתרים כי מת

a creative task, he should bring a sin offering. Two--he should bring a conditional sin offering. Three--he is exempt [from bringing a sacrifice of any sort.]” Rabbi Yose bar Bon raised the question [thus]: “If you were to say that two [stars indicate] doubt [as to whether it is day or night, then] if one saw two stars on the eve of the Sabbath and [others] warned him [that it was the Sabbath, thus making him liable for its violation], yet he [nonetheless] performed a creative task; [and if he subsequently] saw two stars on the departure of the Sabbath and [others] warned him [that it was still the Sabbath], yet he performed a creative task; then either way you like [he is liable for a violation of the Sabbath]. If the first [set of stars] were [an indication that it was still] daytime [and not yet the Sabbath], then the last stars were also [an indication that it was still] daytime [and still the Sabbath], then he is liable [for a violation of the Sabbath] on account of the last set [of stars]. If the last [set of stars] were [an indication that it was now] night time [and the Sabbath had begun], then the first stars were also [an indication that it was now] night time [and no longer the Sabbath], then he is liable [for a violation of the Sabbath] on account of the first set [of stars]. [Another example:] If he saw two stars on the eve of the Sabbath and partially harvested a fig, [and] if he [subsequently returned] in the morning and harvested another part, and if he saw two stars on the departure of the Sabbath and harvested the [last] part of the fig, then either way you like [he is liable for a sin offering]. If the first [set of stars] were [an indication that it was still] daytime [and not yet the Sabbath], then the last stars were also [an indication that it was still] daytime [and still the Sabbath] and the morning harvest joins with that of the departure of the sabbath, and he is liable [for a sin offering] on account of the last set [of stars]. If the last [set of stars] were [an indication that it was] night time [and now the Sabbath], then the last stars were also [an indication that it was] daytime [and no longer the Sabbath] and the morning harvest joins with that of the night of the Sabbath, and he is liable [for a sin offering] on account of the first set [of stars].” These [stars] that you are speaking of are [only] those whose way is not to appear in the daytime. However, we do not count those whose way is to appear in the daytime. Rabbi Yose bar Bon said: “Just so long as three stars may be seen aside from that [one we call] Kokhvata (prob. Venus).” (This may be a scribal error and the original version may have been: “Just so long as three stars may be seen [in one place, just] as one star [can be so seen.]”) Rabbi Yaakov of Romana in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Pazi: “One star, surely day. Two, night.” But does he [truly] have no [time period of] doubt!? He has doubt about [discerning] one star from another. A baraita teaches: “So long as the eastern horizon is reddened, it is daytime. What has been said about the stars, applies to those which are not generally seen until nightfall; for, no note is taken of those which appear before the day is terminated. Therefore, R. Yosse bar R. Aboon says: It means three stars not counting, R. Jacob from Darom (south) says: One star indicates that it is still day; but two stars certainly show that it is night. Is there any doubt of this? No; the doubt can only exist between the stars visible by day, and the other stars. With regard to this, we are taught that it is still day as long as the sky is red towards the east;

Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

Rebbi Immi in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: Ancillary services13. Actions either such as reading the Torah which is not absolutely necessary, in that its omission does not invalidate the service, or necessary actions which may be performed by a non-Cohen, such as slaughter of sacrifices. are performed in white garments14But not necessarily in linen garments as prescribed in Lev. 16:4 for all service performed inside the sanctuary.. Rebbi Mattanah said, the Mishnah implies this: “otherwise in his own white stole.” Rebbi Yose asked: Why? Even though they are outside? Is not slaughter only outside and is performed in golden garments15The Mishnah (3:5, 7:3,6) prescribes that the daily and holiday sacrifices are offered by the High Priest in his golden garments in which he serves all other days of the year.? Rebbi Yasa in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: If he wants, he performs in golden garments, if he wants, he performs in white garments. We find that slaughter16While the High Priest must wear his everyday garments (Mishnah 7:7) for all priestly actions required for daily and holiday sacrifices, this is not directly prescribed for slaughter which is not a priestly duty., if he wants, he performs in golden garments, if he wants, he performs in white garments.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

Rebbi Immi in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: Ancillary services13. Actions either such as reading the Torah which is not absolutely necessary, in that its omission does not invalidate the service, or necessary actions which may be performed by a non-Cohen, such as slaughter of sacrifices. are performed in white garments14But not necessarily in linen garments as prescribed in Lev. 16:4 for all service performed inside the sanctuary.. Rebbi Mattanah said, the Mishnah implies this: “otherwise in his own white stole.” Rebbi Yose asked: Why? Even though they are outside? Is not slaughter only outside and is performed in golden garments15The Mishnah (3:5, 7:3,6) prescribes that the daily and holiday sacrifices are offered by the High Priest in his golden garments in which he serves all other days of the year.? Rebbi Yasa in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: If he wants, he performs in golden garments, if he wants, he performs in white garments. We find that slaughter16While the High Priest must wear his everyday garments (Mishnah 7:7) for all priestly actions required for daily and holiday sacrifices, this is not directly prescribed for slaughter which is not a priestly duty., if he wants, he performs in golden garments, if he wants, he performs in white garments.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Shekalim

HALAKHAH: 94Here starts the discussion of Mishnah 5. What is gained by redeeming incense with Temple money, which is not profane? Would not Temple property be redeemed by Temple property? What does he do? Rebbi Simeon bar Carsana said, he brings coins and redeems them for the building95Both the scribe’s text and that of B are difficult to understand. While it is accepted that the Temple is built as profane building and only sanctified when completed (Babli Me`ilah14a), once it is sacred it cannot be redeemed. If the money is legitimately paid for a sacrificial animal, it belongs to the owner of the animal and is no longer available for Temple use. Tosephta Me`ilah1:23 reads: “A worker who did work for the Temple for a mina or two may not say, give me this cow for a mina or this garment for 50 {denar} since Temple property cannot be redeemed for work but only for coins. What does one do? One takes the wages of the artisans {from the sheqalim} and redeems them on the artisans’ money, gives them to the artisans as their wages; then buys them back from the disbursement of the lodge to pay back the workers for the coins they earlier gave to the Temple.” A similar text seems to be intended here.; brings incense and redeems it for them, and gives it96The incense. to the artisans as their wages. What should be done with those coins? Rebbi says, I am saying that they should be given to the family Garmu and the family Eutinos who were experts in compounding the incense and in making the shew-bread97Cf. Mishnah Yoma3:11.. Rebbi Samuel bar Rav <isaac<98Name added from B. said, only if they were due to them beforehand99Since Temple money can only become profane for actual debts incurred by the Temple. Advance payments are not possible.. Rebbi Ḥiyya bar Abba asked, what if they were not due beforehand? There came Rebbi Abba in the name of Rebbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: One uses them to adorn the altar75It is given to the gift account to buy elevation sacrifices in times when the altar otherwise would have been idle.. Rebbi Abba bar Cohen asked before Rebbi Yose: The opinion of Rebbi Ḥiyya bar Abba seems inverted. Here it is questionable for him; there it is obvious for him100How can he ask when he himself teaches the answer which his teacher had given? He does not question that a possible use is to give the money to the gift account; he questions whether this is the only possible use.
The inverse order in B must be a scribal error.. He told him, where it is questionable for him, for Service vessels; where it is obvious for him, to adorn the altar.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Full Chapter