Talmud Jerusalem
Talmud Jerusalem

Talmud for Yoma 5:1

עשירית האיפה היאך קריבה חצייה קריבה או שלימה קרבה מן מה דכתיב (ויקרא ט׳:כ״ג) ויבא משה ואהרן אל אהל מועד מלמד שלא בא עמו אלא ללמדו על מעשה הקטורת הדא אמרה חציים קרבה אין תימר שלימה קרבה ניתני על מעשה קטרת ועל עשירית האיפה א"ר תנחום בר יודן ולא בעבודת שבפנין אנן קיימין כבר לימדו עבודות שבחוץ מילואים מה היו קרבן יחיד או קרבן ציבור מן מה דכתיב (ויקרא ח׳:י״ח) ויסמכו אהרן ובניו את ידיהם על ראש האיל הדא אמרה קרבן יחיד והתני קרבן ציבור א"ר אידי נתנדבו ציבור ומסרום להם מילואים מאיכן למדו מן הקרבנות או ממעשה בראשית אין תימר מן הקרבנות הלילה הולך אחר היום אין תימר ממעשה בראשית היום הולך אחר הלילה אין תימר מן הקרבנות לילה אחרון אין לו יום אין תימר ממעשה בראשית יום ראשון אין לו לילה תמן תנינן אלו מושכין ואלו מניחין וטפחו של זה בצד טפחו של זה שנאמר (שמות כ״ה:ל׳) לפני תמיד מתני' דרבי מאיר מדר' יוחנן מודה ר"מ שאם פירקו את הישנה בשחרית וסידרו את החדשה בין הערבים אף זו היתה תמיד רבי יוסה אומר אף אילו נוטלין ואילו מניחין אף זו היתה תמיד אמר ר"י מישיבת אהרן ובניו למד רבי יוסי כמה דתימר בישיבת אהרן ובניו צריך שימסור יום

R. Hanina says: The sun must have gone down and the moon have commenced to rise. In effect R. Samuel says: The moon cannot shine as long as the sun still lightens, neither can the moon shine after the sun has darted his (morning) beams. R. Samuel bar-Hiya, in the name of R. Hanina, says: If a man, when the sun has begun to set, descends from the summit of Mount Carmel to bathe in the sea, and re-ascends to partake of the oblations, he has certainly bathed during the daytime. It is, however, only a certainty in the case of one taking cross-roads to shorten the route; but not in the case of one who follows the high road (Strata). What is meant by "the intermediate period "? R. Tanhooma says: It resembles the delay of a drop of blood placed on the edge of a sword, i.e. the time required for the drop of blood to divide and run down on either side of the blade, is equivalent to the period of transition. According to R. Nehemiah, it means the time it would require for a man to run half a mile, after sunset. R. Yosse says: This twilight lasts no longer than the twinkling of an eye, and not even the men of science could measure it. Whilst the R. Yosse and R. Aha were together, the former said to the latter: Does it not seem to you that the passage of this half a mile (twilight) lasts but a second? It is certainly my opinion, said R. Aha. However, R. Hiya does not say so, but each twinkling of an eye, measured by the duration of the passage of half a mile (as R. Nehemiah), is doubtful. R. Mena says : I have made an objection in the presence of R. Aha: Have we not learnt elsewhere, that if an impurity is seen, once during the day and again during the intermediate period, or once in the twilight and again on the morrow, when the certainty exists that the impurity dates partly from this day and partly from the next day, there is a certainty as to the circumstances of the impurity, and the sacrifice is obligatory.

Jerusalem Talmud Shevuot

There, we have stated: “They removed the cup and the censer for him”70Mishnah Yoma.5:1. The reference really is to the end of that Mishnah: “The High Priest takes the censer in his right hand and the cup in the left hand.” In general there is a rule that all priestly service in the Temple has to be performed with the right hand only. The left hand has to be used here to make it possible for the High Priest to enter the Holiest of Holies only once. On that it is noted (Yoma5:2, 42b l. 52) that if he went twice, using only his right hand, the service is valid. Nevertheless, it is sinful to enter the Temple building more often than necessary. About this the paragraph here is then copied in Yoma.. About which of them does he become liable? About the first or the last? The colleagues say, about the last. Rebbi Yose told them, one says to him, enter, and you say about the last? But we must hold about the first71Since the first entry is necessary in any case, the High Priest cannot be faulted for the first entry even if he only carries the censer..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

Rebbi Joḥanan said, so he should not err98This refers to the way of counting as explained in Mishnah 4. Why does he have to count 1+n? Babli 55a.. Rebbi Zeˋira said, that he should finish his sprinkling with “seven”99Since in all he has to sprinkle 8 times, it is preferable to end with “7” which is an odd number and means “luck”.. But was it not stated100The prefix ק is Babylonian Aramaic. The version in which the second number precedes the first is R. Jehudah’s in Tosephta 2:14, R. Meïr’s in the Babli 55a., “seven and one”? Rebbi Abun said, it is written101Lev. 16:14; cf. Note 84., before the cover .. seven. Why does the verse say, he shall sprinkle? That the first sprinkling should be counted with them102Sprinkling is mentioned separately for the blood on the cover of the Ark and the seven times in front of the Ark. Therefore they have to be mentioned separately in counting. Babli 55a..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Full Chapter