Talmud for Yoma 6:1
ללילה ולילה ליום הכא צריך שימסור יום ללילה ולילה ליום רבי חייה בר יוסה אמר מכיון שמסר יום ללילה דייו מה אמר ר' חייה בר יוסף בישיבת אהרן ובניו מה אין תמן שכתוב בו תמיד את אמר מכיון שמסר יום ללילה דייו כאן שאין כתוב בו תמיד לא כל שכן אשכחת אמר על דעתיה דר' יוחנן היה שם שבע עמידות וששה פירוקין על דעתיה דר' חייה בר יוסף היה שם ארבע עשרה עמידות ושלש עשרה פירוקין תני כל שבעת ימי המילואים היה משה מושח את המשכן ומעמידו ומפרקו וסודר עליו את העבודות וביום השמיני העמידו ולא פירקו ר' יוסה בי ר' יודה אמר אף ביום השמיני העמידו ומשחו ופירקו א"ר זעירא זאת אומרת שהקמת הלילה פסולה לעבודת היום אשכחת אמר על דעתיה דר' יוחנן כר' יוסי בר ר' יודה היה שם
But if the doubt exists, that the sight of the impurity dates partly from to-day and partly from the morrow, the impurity is certain, but the sacrifice uncertain. On account of this, R. Hiya bar-Joseph answered in the presence of B. Yohanan: Who is it who taught that one of these occasions of impurity can be divided into two? It was R. Yosse. He answered: You thus refute your own opinion; for you say that each twinkling of an eye of the time accomplished in a half-mile, according to R. Nehemiah, is doubtful, and not only the end of it. No contradiction can be offered to this; when the Prophet Elijah shall return to this world, and will explain to us what this twilight means, no one will contest him. R. Hanina argued against the disciples of the Rabbis: Since, said he, it is night as soon as three stars are visible, be the sun still high in the heavens, the same must apply (before the day) in the morning. R. Abba said: It is written (in Gen. xix. 23) : "The sun was risen upon the earth when Lot entered into Zoar;" and is written (in Lev. xxii. 7): "And when the sun is down he shall be clean." The sunrise is compared with the sunset: As sunset corresponds to the disappearance of the sun from the sight of man, so also sunrise is manifested by the appearance of the sun to the eye of man.
Jerusalem Talmud Yoma
Jerusalem Talmud Yoma
Jerusalem Talmud Shekalim
What did one do with the leftover in the lodge47What is left from the Temple tax at the end of the fiscal year.? One buys with it wine, oil, and fine flour,48For public sacrifices these are paid for from the coins disbursed from the lodge. Wine, oil, and flour for private sacrifices are bought from the Temple as explained in the next Chapter. R. Ismael holds that the original funds for this operation come from the surplus of the Temple tax; R. Aqiba must hold that this is a self-financing non-profit operation. and the gain is the Temple’s, the words of Rebbi Ismael. Rebbi Aqiba says, one gains neither for the Temple nor funds for the poor49He holds that the Temple may not be involved in commercial transaction. He objects to investing funds destined for the poor not only since avoidance of loss is more important than possible gain but also that money for the poor must be available at all times for possible emergencies..
What did they use the leftover of the disbursement73If money was left in the boxes into which it was taken from the lodge at the time when new money was disbursed, the amount of new money was not reduced but the old money was put into a separate account to be used for other needs of the Temple. for? Gold sheets coating for the Holiest of Holies. Rebbi Ismael said, the leftover of produce74The gain made by the Temple in providing flour, oil, and wine, for private sacrifices. is for adornment of the altar75It is given to the gift account to buy elevation sacrifices in times when the altar otherwise would have been idle., the leftover of the disbursement is for Service vessels76The vessels used in sacrificial acts.. Rebbi Aqiba says, the leftover of the disbursement is for adornment of the altar, the leftover of the libations77As explained in Halakhah 5, the income from the trading arrangements with the suppliers to the Temple. is for Service vessels. Rebbi Ḥanania the executive officer of the Cohanim says, the leftover of the libations is for adornment of the altar, the leftover of the disbursement is for Service vessels. Neither of them did agree about produce78R. Ḥanania agrees with R. Aqiba that the Temple has to provide the produce at cost and cannot make a gain on this service..