תלמוד על ביצה 2:1
Jerusalem Talmud Beitzah
“30Tosephta 2:4, Babli 17b. It was stated: Rebbi Simeon ben Eleazar said, the House of Shammai and the House of Hillel agree that there are two dishes. Where do they disagree? About the fish and the egg on it31Cf. Note 3., where the House of Shammai are saying it is one dish while the House of Hillel are saying they are two dishes. Everybody agrees that if he applied the egg on salted fish32A boiled egg is used to fill a salted herring. This is easily recognized as two dishes.
The expression פרפר is that of the corrector, following Babli and the Tosephta. It is no longer recognizable what was the original word written by the scribe., or cut leeks under the fish, or cooked two kinds in a pot, that they are counted as two dishes.” And practice follows the student33In the Babli 17b practice is decided as following the Mishnah according to the House of Hillel, i. e., that only one dish is needed for eruv. Since the anonymous Mishnah is supposed to be Rebbi Meïr’s, and R. Simeon ben Eleazar everywhere appears as student of Rebbi Meïr (and colleague of Rebbi), the Yerushalmi decides that practice follows the Tosephta against the Mishnah..
The expression פרפר is that of the corrector, following Babli and the Tosephta. It is no longer recognizable what was the original word written by the scribe., or cut leeks under the fish, or cooked two kinds in a pot, that they are counted as two dishes.” And practice follows the student33In the Babli 17b practice is decided as following the Mishnah according to the House of Hillel, i. e., that only one dish is needed for eruv. Since the anonymous Mishnah is supposed to be Rebbi Meïr’s, and R. Simeon ben Eleazar everywhere appears as student of Rebbi Meïr (and colleague of Rebbi), the Yerushalmi decides that practice follows the Tosephta against the Mishnah..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat
Rebbi Abba bat Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan, it is forbidden to move a tarkos223Cf. Chapter 1, Note 115. At this place, Kohut proposes to read תרנוס, Greek θρόνος “chair”. From the following it follows that one speaks of a chair to which one ascends in steps. {Also cf. Greek θρᾶνος, ὁ “bench, wooden beam” (E. G.).}. Rebbi Immi instructed: it is permitted. Rebbi Jeremiah saw them moving it at the great assembly and did not object to them224He did not want to decide between R. Joḥanan and R. Immi.. In the House of Rebbi Yannai they said, up to three it is a chair, more than this a ladder225Later it will be discussed where the difference between chair and ladder is relevant.. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, he who permits follows Rebbi Simeon, as it was stated: “A person may not drag a bed, or a chair, or a footstool, or a fauteuil75Latin subsellium., because he makes a groove, but Rebbi Simeon permits.” 76This paragraph also is in Besah 2:9 (61d line 22) (י). Rebbi Abba in the name of Rebbi Ḥuna, Rebbi Ḥaggai in the name of Rebbi Zeˋira, Rebbi Yose in the name of Rebbi Ila: The Sages admit to Rebbi Simeon that a chair whose legs are stuck in mud one is permitted to move on the Sabbath77Since the mud is soft, the groove will disappear by itself; it was not “made”.. Since you are saying, it is permitted to move it, similarly it is permitted to return it. Rebbi Yose said, we also have stated78Mishnah Kilaim 1:9 referring to turnips and radishes partially hidden.: “and they may be removed on the Sabbath.” Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, it is Rebbi Simeon’s. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, a Mishnah says so, “one may not drag any vessel except a carriage because it presses79Mishnah Besah 2:10. The wheels of the carriage will press the dust down, not move it sideways as would be the case if one drags anything without wheels. The Sages opposing R. Simeon forbid moving the “unprepared” dust even if this was not the intention of the person acting. This Mishnah cannot follow R. Simeon; it contradicts the Mishnah in Kilaim..”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy