תלמוד על חלה 2:1

Rebbi Jeremiah asked before Rebbi Zeïra: One mixed four qab²⁵Since Mishnah 2:6 states that dough made from ⁵/₄ qab of flour is subject to ḥallah, it is clear that one has to read here “quarter qab” instead of qab. The leavened flour by itself is not enough to induce an obligation of ḥallah. separately and made them leavened, and another four qab²⁶Another ⁵/₄ qab of rice, millet, or pea flour which cannot be leavened and which by themselves never induce an obligation of ḥallah. separately and mixed them. Then at the moment of their obligation²⁷After he mixed the leavened dough with the non-grain flour, he now has 2 qab which potentially are obligated for ḥallah. for ḥallah can they become maẓẓah or leavened? [He said to him, its kind becomes maẓẓah or leavened.²⁸If the leavened flour were more than the unleavened, the unleavened could be disregarded and all would be subject to ḥallah but when is it evenly split it does not satisfy our crtiteria.] Rebbi Jonah parallels Rebbi Jeremiah, Rebbi Yose parallels Rebbi Zeïra. Rebbi Jonah parallels Rebbi Jeremiah, just as Rebbi Jeremiah says, only if it is called bread, so Rebbi Jonah says, only if it is called bread^15,A similar text Sifry Num. 110. As regards Passover only, Babli Pesaḥim 35a, Mekhilta deR. Ismael Bo Chap. 8, 17; Sifry Num. 146.¹⁶Deut. 16:2.. Rebbi Yose parallels Rebbi Zeïra, just as Rebbi Zeïra said only if its kind is called bread, so Rebbi Yose said only if its kind is called bread¹²This must be R. Simeon ben Laqish. R. Yose asserts that R. Ismael accepted the inference as valid; “dough” includes every bread-dough made from grains similar to the bread grains wheat and barley.. Rebbi Yose parallels Rebbi Hila²⁹He says in Halakhah 3:6 that there can be no obligation of ḥallah unless more then 50% is bread flour and the finished product tastes like bread. R. Zeïra in that Halakhah is quoted as stating that R. Hila got the names of the Tannaïm wrong in his baraita. even though he disagrees with him.

For him who holds it is obligated¹³⁴Early Second Tithe obligated for heave. It was established in Terumot 2:1 that heave of the tithe may be given from one batch for an unrelated batch., if he used it as heave of the tithe for some other produce, how do you treat it? Like a heap of sheaves which became dema‘¹³⁵Profane mixed with heave; cf. Terumot 3:2. or like a dough which became dema‘¹³⁶Which is exempt from ḥallah, cf. Mishnah 4.? A heap of sheaves which became dema‘ you say is obligated, a dough which became dema‘ you say is free! Rebbi Tanḥuma in the name of Rebbi Ḥuna: Concerning a heap of sheaves which became dema‘ if he transgressed and gave heave before it became obligated, is it not heave¹³⁷The Constantinople print (Benvenist) has this as a declarative sentence: “It is heave.” The heap of sheaves is not processed but if heave is given, automatically all tithes are also due.? A dough which became dema‘ if he transgressed and gave ḥallah from it before it became obligated¹³⁸A (sufficiently large) bread dough is potentially obligated for ḥallah the moment it is no longer dry flour. is not ḥallah as we have stated there¹³⁹Mishnah 2:5.: “If somebody gives ḥallah from flour it is not ḥallah and will be robbery in the hand if the Cohen.¹⁴⁰The two cases have been explained but the original question was not answered.”