תלמוד על פסחים 7:3
Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim
Rebbi Ḥiyya bar Abba said, Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina asked: Then338Since the rabbis agree that a group may split into two before they start eating, there is no fixed place of the Pesaḥ before they start eating and there can be no removal. one who removes should not be liable up to the moment when he eats. Rebbi Samuel, Rebbi Abbahu in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan : One who removes is not liable up to the moment when he eats. Rebbi Zeˋira said, but it was stated there, an individual who removed the volume of an olive from a group is liable but he did not disqualify himself as a member339 of the group. This implies, even if he did not eat. If you would say, he ate, why did he not disqualify himself as a member of the group? Rebbi Yose said, when he removed it he disqualified it. Even if he ate, he ate something disqualified. Where was this said? There is breaking after breaking but not removing after removing340(Cf. Note 290). It is sinful to break a broken bone of a Pesaḥ, but it is not sinful to further remove a removed part.. Either this means that when he removes it, he disqualifies it, or it means that he is not liable up to the moment when he eats341Either there can be no removal after removal because the first removal disqualifies the meat, and moving disqualified Pesaḥ is not sanctioned, or “removing” means “removing and eating” and the first removal did not count..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy