תלמוד על שבת 5:1

It was stated: Rebbi Joḥanan ben Rebbi Marius said, if he did not remove his hand from it. But if he removed it it is forbidden⁵⁸Babli 38b.. ⁷¹This paragraph and most of the next are also in Kilaim 1:9 (Notes 167–178). The baraita is quoted in Babli Šabbat 123a, Eruvin 77a. An unripe fig which he hid in straw or a flat pita which he hid in coals may be taken on the Sabbath if they were partially uncovered, otherwise they may not be taken⁷²The figs had been covered in straw to hasten the ripening process. By this the owner shows that he does not consider them ready for eating; they are not prepared food for the Sabbath. But if they are partially uncovered they are counted as food. It must be assumed that the coals in which the pita was roasted are now cold; there is no problem of making fire and in moving them.. Rebbi Eleazar ben Thaddeus said, in any case he can stick in a spit or a knife and take it⁷³In this case he only moves the food; if the cover (straw or cold coals) is also moved this is incidental and not the goal of his action; it is not forbidden for R. Simeon. But if he would use his hands to take the completely covered food it would have to be his intention to remove the cover first; this is forbidden according to all opinions.. This [statement] of Rebbi Eleazar ben Thaddeus follows Rebbi Simeon, as we have stated⁷⁴In the Babli version (22a, 29b, 46a, Pesaḥim 101a, Menaḥot 41b; Tosephta Yom Ṭov 2:18) only R. Simeon’s opinion is quoted.: “A person may not drag a bed, or a chair, or a footstool⁷⁵Latin subsellium., or a fauteuil^75aGreek καθέδρα, ἡ., because he makes a groove, but Rebbi Simeon permits.”

There, we have stated⁹⁸Mishnah Sukkah 2:4. A booth (sukkah) for Tabernacles must have a thatched roof and at least three walls. Up to two walls can be tree trunks. Since biblically one is forbidden to cut or pluck anything from a tree on a holiday, rabbinically one is forbidden to climb on it. The Mishnah permits the use of the trunks as walls on the intermediate days of Tabernacles but not on the holiday.: “Two human-made and one a tree, or two as trees and one human-made is valid but one may not enter it on the holiday.” [Here you are saying it is valid but one may not enter it on the holiday]⁹⁹Added from G (and the parallel in Sukkah). but there you are saying his eruv is a [valid] eruv and it is permitted to move it⁹⁷If the food is on the bench, one may tilt the bench, the food falls down and is accessible. In this and the preceding case the prohibition of transporting cannot apply to the food.. Rebbi Jeremiah said, one on top, the other at the side¹⁰⁰Since the roof must be on top of the walls, in the case of the Mishnah it must rest on the top of the trees (or top of branches) which is rabbinically forbidden. But the basket is on the side of the trunk and the statement follows the opinion that the sides of tree trunks may be used on Sabbaths and holidays.. This learns from that and that learns from this. This learns from that, if there were two pegs protruding and he thatched over them it is valid and one uses it on the holiday¹⁰¹Šabbat Chapter 5 Notes 39–43. Cf. Babli Šabbat 154b.. That learns from this, if he put it on a tree branch his eruv is a [valid] eruv and it is forbidden to move it¹⁰²This is the corrector’s text. The scribe wrote correctly אין “you cannot consider …”.. Rebbi Yose said, in both cases it is at the side. How is that? As Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa said in the name of Rebbi Zeˋira: This is Rebbi Eleazar ben Simon’s, as Rebbi Eleazar ben Simon says, one is permitted to use the sides of an animal on the Sabbath. There is no difference between sides of an animal and sides of a tree¹⁰³This refers to the statement in Mishnah 3 that an eruv in a cistern always is valid. If the cistern is surrounded by public domain, it is a separate private domain. How can anybody have an eruv in a domain different from where he would be on the Sabbath? The answer is that the cistern must be dry and he intends to take the bottom of the cistern as his place of Sabbath rest..

[There, we have stated]⁴¹Corrector’s addition from Eruvin; senseless here since the quote is from Sukkah.: “Two human-made and one a tree, or two as trees and one human-made is valid but one may not enter it on the holiday.” Here you are saying it is valid but one may not enter it on the holiday but there you are saying his eruv is a {valid} eruv and it is permitted to move it. Rebbi Jeremiah said, one from the top, the other from the bottom⁴²With the text of Eruvin read: “from the side” (in the case of the sukkah.). This learns from that and that learns from this. This learns from that, if he put it on the side of a tree his eruv is a {valid} eruv and it is (prohibited) [permitted]⁴³With the scribe and the text of Eruvin read: “prohibited.” to move it. That learns from this, if there were two pegs protruding and he thatched over them it is valid and one uses it on the holiday⁴⁴Since the roof must be on top of the walls, in the case of the Mishnah it must rest on the top of the trees (or top of branches) which is rabbinically forbidden. But the basket is on the side of the trunk and the statement follows the opinion that the sides of tree trunks may be used on Sabbaths and holidays.. Rebbi Yose said, in both cases it is at the side. How is that? As Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa said in the name of Rebbi Ze`ira: This is Rebbi Eleazar ben Simon’s, as Rebbi Eleazar ben Simon says, one is permitted to use the sides of an animal on the Sabbath. There is no difference between sides of an animal and sides of a tree⁴⁵Šabbat Chapter 5 Notes 39–43. Cf. Babli Šabbat154b..