Talmud Jerusalem
Talmud Jerusalem

Mishnah for Peah 3:1

אין בעשייתן מצוה: והראיון מתני' בראיית פנים אבל בראיית קרבן יש לה שיעור ואתיא כיי דמר ר' יוחנן מעה כסף שתי כסף דבר תורה תנא רבי יוסי קומי רבי יוחנן ראיה כל שהוא חכמים הן שאמרו מעה כסף שתי כסף א"ל ויש כעין זו א"ר יונה וכל השיעורים לא חכמים הן שנתנו כזית מן המת כזית מן הנבלה וכעדשה מן השרץ לא אתא מישאול אלא כהדא דתני רבי הושעיא (שמות כ״ג:ט״ו) לא יראו פני ריקם אפילו כל שהוא חכמים הם שאמרו מעה כסף שתי כסף וקשיא מן דו סמך לדבר תורה הוא אמר חכמים אמרו מעה כסף שתי כסף אמר רבי יוסי בר בון רבי יוחנן כדעתיה דרבי יוחנן אמר כל השיעורים הלכה למשה מסיני דו אמר מעה כסף שתי כסף דבר תורה רבי הושעיא כדעתיה דרבי הושעיא אמר האוכל איסור בזמן הזה צריך לרשום עליו את השיעור שמא יעמוד ב"ד אחר וישנה עליו את השיעורים ויהי' יודע מאיזה שיעור אכל אמרי חזרי ביה רבי יוחנן מן הדא רבי יונה ורבי יוסי תרוויהון אמרין לא חזר ביה ועוד מן הדא דאמר רבי לא איתפלגון חזקיה ורבי יוחנן חזקיה אמר חולק אדם את חובתו לשתי בהמות ורבי יוחנן אמר אין אדם חולק חובתו לשתי בהמות אלא צרי' שיהא בידו שתי כסף לכל אחד ואחד ואמר ר"ש בן לקיש בשם חזקיה אדם טופל בהמה לבהמה

a creative task, he should bring a sin offering. Two--he should bring a conditional sin offering. Three--he is exempt [from bringing a sacrifice of any sort.]” Rabbi Yose bar Bon raised the question [thus]: “If you were to say that two [stars indicate] doubt [as to whether it is day or night, then] if one saw two stars on the eve of the Sabbath and [others] warned him [that it was the Sabbath, thus making him liable for its violation], yet he [nonetheless] performed a creative task; [and if he subsequently] saw two stars on the departure of the Sabbath and [others] warned him [that it was still the Sabbath], yet he performed a creative task; then either way you like [he is liable for a violation of the Sabbath]. If the first [set of stars] were [an indication that it was still] daytime [and not yet the Sabbath], then the last stars were also [an indication that it was still] daytime [and still the Sabbath], then he is liable [for a violation of the Sabbath] on account of the last set [of stars]. If the last [set of stars] were [an indication that it was now] night time [and the Sabbath had begun], then the first stars were also [an indication that it was now] night time [and no longer the Sabbath], then he is liable [for a violation of the Sabbath] on account of the first set [of stars]. [Another example:] If he saw two stars on the eve of the Sabbath and partially harvested a fig, [and] if he [subsequently returned] in the morning and harvested another part, and if he saw two stars on the departure of the Sabbath and harvested the [last] part of the fig, then either way you like [he is liable for a sin offering]. If the first [set of stars] were [an indication that it was still] daytime [and not yet the Sabbath], then the last stars were also [an indication that it was still] daytime [and still the Sabbath] and the morning harvest joins with that of the departure of the sabbath, and he is liable [for a sin offering] on account of the last set [of stars]. If the last [set of stars] were [an indication that it was] night time [and now the Sabbath], then the last stars were also [an indication that it was] daytime [and no longer the Sabbath] and the morning harvest joins with that of the night of the Sabbath, and he is liable [for a sin offering] on account of the first set [of stars].” These [stars] that you are speaking of are [only] those whose way is not to appear in the daytime. However, we do not count those whose way is to appear in the daytime. Rabbi Yose bar Bon said: “Just so long as three stars may be seen aside from that [one we call] Kokhvata (prob. Venus).” (This may be a scribal error and the original version may have been: “Just so long as three stars may be seen [in one place, just] as one star [can be so seen.]”) Rabbi Yaakov of Romana in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Pazi: “One star, surely day. Two, night.” But does he [truly] have no [time period of] doubt!? He has doubt about [discerning] one star from another. A baraita teaches: “So long as the eastern horizon is reddened, it is daytime. What has been said about the stars, applies to those which are not generally seen until nightfall; for, no note is taken of those which appear before the day is terminated. Therefore, R. Yosse bar R. Aboon says: It means three stars not counting, R. Jacob from Darom (south) says: One star indicates that it is still day; but two stars certainly show that it is night. Is there any doubt of this? No; the doubt can only exist between the stars visible by day, and the other stars. With regard to this, we are taught that it is still day as long as the sky is red towards the east;

Mishnah Sheviit

One who thins out his olive-trees [in the seventh year]: Bet Shammai says: he cuts them down to the ground. Bet Hillel says: he may completely uproot them. They agree that if one levels his field, he can only cut them down to the ground. What is considered “thinning out”? One or two plants. And what is considered “leveling”? Three plants next to each other. This applies to his own property only, but from the property of another, even he that levels may uproot.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Mishnah Sheviit

[A loan secured by] a prozbul is not cancelled. This was one of the things enacted by Hillel the elder; for when he observed people refraining from lending to one another, and thus transgressing what is written in the Torah, “Beware, lest you harbor the base thought, [‘The seventh year, the year of remission, is approaching,’ so that you are mean to your needy kinsman and give him nothing.” Hillel enacted the prozbul.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Full Chapter